Ego Trip to Mars

Part of our duties is to liaise with other lecturers teaching the same subject at other branches. Sometime last week I received an e-mail from an administrator (on behalf of the subject lecturer) requesting guidance on how to approach a particular assignment question for a law paper.

I gave my opinion as requested- lo and behold I received an e-mail from the lecturer to dispute my suggestion, with explanation on why my opinion can't be used. The e-mail was signed off with her title: Barrister at Law.

Fascinating! To begin with, why didn't this human being just e-mail me directly? Why go through an administrator? She couldn't e-mail me to ask the question yet she was able to take time off from her busy schedule to reply to my e-mail to prove me wrong. My conscience is clear- an opinion was asked, I gave it. The administrator asked a general question- I gave an opinion that fits the general nature of the query.

Anyway, my opinion can be proved or disproved- do either one if you have to but it's not necessary to be rude. By the way, you're welcome- Ms Barrister at Law! I decided to be nonchalant with my reply to her, setting the facts straight. There's indeed no point in entertaining negative energy sources.

This one's another classic. Last 2 years a similar incident happened. I gave an opinion why some questions may be unsuitable for certain subjects, supported with justifications that are purely academic-related. I received a reply which underlying tone spoke volumes about the writer's dislike of my response. It was signed off with a name, followed by a string of academic & professional qualifications. Dude, do you need help removing the chip off your shoulder?

I come away from these experiences humbled. I am who I am and I don't have to exert myself to prove might or importance. Sometimes it is crucial to remember that we are servants to a higher power and live our lives accordingly.