Tuesday, August 12, 2025
Friday, July 18, 2025
She wants to see the view
No Longer
My dreams are no longer about falling into the endless abyss.
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
The Other Half
My Love is Quiet
Saturday, June 14, 2025
The Holy Union
When I was young, I had such a good impression of 'marriage'. My parents had a wonderful (albeit short) relationship. They were married 18 years when Baba passed away. My grandparents aunts uncles generally have lasting marriages. Maybe external families would have feigned happiness during our short visits (this is my devil's advocate mind working double time) but overall I consider marriage a good thing, a generally positive experience. One that leads to growth/ maturity/ belonging.
Now with two failed marriages, I am unable to impart the same confidence in marriage to my children or people around me. Friends are literally divided now. His side and my side. I really don't mind if they all take his side and discount me as 'too demanding'. I am an introvert and I prefer being alone than being with a lot of people, and I probably don't mind taking all the blame.
'Marriage' cannot answer for itself, for it is the people in the marriage who will make it work.
'Marriage' is the presence of the other through thick and thin. The promise to respect honour and cherish for life. To be a faithful companion, the keeper of all secrets and things buried deep in our hearts not meant for public consumption. To stay when things get tough. To be with each other in good and bad times. To trust that the other person will hold your heart with care and not crush it mercilessly.
'Marriage' is probably is not the answer. Rather, it is a means towards a particular end shaped by the parties in that marriage. It is mutually agreed, shaped by sheer will and resilience.
'Marriage' done right, I believe, can be satisfying and fulfilling for both parties. How to do it right, unfortunately, to me is very much a mystery. Like Bermuda Triangle. Or Yeti. Mythical even.
'Marriage' is not a flash in the pan, neither it is as happy as the wedding celebration that many would strenuously prepare for. I'm wondering: if people had paid more attention to the post-wedding relationship more than the wedding, would more marriages have worked out?
'Marriage' is holy, so holy that if anyone ever studied marriage properly he/she may not even try getting married. Maybe I was overly optimistic, or plain moronic to miss all the red flags.
'Marriage' is not something that worked for me. I get bored too easily, I demand too much from my partner, I find fault, I projected my anxiety too much, I am too unstable.
'Marriage', I am sorry I could not make you/ us work out. Let me continue the rest of my journey on my own, fueled by the strength of those who have walked the path before me in solitude.
An exaggeration
*This is a work of fiction from a troubled mind
This morning on FB Reels:
QUESTION: Is it possible for a couple to recover from infidelity?
ANSWER: There are 2 sides: the doer (D) and the recipient of the aftermath (R). The recipient struggles to 'accept'/ 'forgive' what happened and tries to put together pieces of the surrounding events. The doer suffers with remorse/ pain knowing that R has been hurt in the process. Both parties handle pain, but recovery lies mainly in the hand of the recipient: that is, if R can live with that knowledge and be 'okay' with it. Both D and R has to be ready for the past being dug up and discussed, towards mutual healing, however tiring it all could be.
My summary: I cannot ever live with pain of betrayal, nor will I be ok with it. I'm done. I might change my mind 10-20-30 years down the road, but as of now my answer is NO.
Last night a friend said "I do not subscribe to polygamy- why would a man want to take care of multiple women when taking care of one is such a chore already?"
Many men participants in the event agree to the statement, but I have further questions in my mind (wishing that I could say them out loud):
MY QUESTIONS:
Does that stand qualify you or other men to keep candies on the side AND JUSTIFY IT by saying that "She's not going to be a second-third-fourth wife" + "I stay loyal to my wife, my one and only."
Is emotional attachment or crush or longing necessarily better than a blatant affair OR intending to take someone as a second-third-fourth wife?
If this is the stand in many men's mind, what is their stand on emotional affairs labeled as 'just friends' + 'we have known each other for YEARS' + "there's nothing going on" + "you're just imagining things".
To me this is the most confusing thing ever. In my mind (rightly or wrongly) when a husband (or wife) pays attention and invests emotionally in another person, that husband (or wife) did not put their marriage as priority. Ergo that marriage to him (or her) was deemed unimportant, hence justifying various external relations that fulfils them emotionally but in fact they are merely time-wasters, taking away from the ACTUAL RELATIONSHIP that he/ she should have invested in in the first place!
Why did logic not prevail? Whose fault is that? Did D ever consider R's feelings at any point?
This whole thing is bloody mysterious, if you ask me 🤔