It is said that we need 10,000 hours to master something.
(please search for the information yourself, because there are also debates on this particular concept & I'd rather not get into that for this post).
For me I have "mastery" in Teaching and Academic-related matters.
I have also done my 10,000 hours for legal practice, however if I need to get back to that I probably need to revise quite a bit.. and I must remember that I have not lost anything; questioning and legal reasoning abilities remains for life!
What have I learnt:
1- that teaching is a passion: it cannot be faked- it is just not possible
2- that students can bring out the teacher's potential, as much as the reverse (and popularly held) belief
3- that improvements can also be made in many different ways, so long as I set my ego aside
Which skills do I bring forth:
1- making difficult law concepts easy to understand; the rest are just details
2- writing and summarising key points
3- creating and assessing modules
What is the channel/ outlet:
1- my classes
2- sharing sessions with colleagues
3- mentoring of junior members of staff
Granted I am FAR from good.
I still tell too much to my students & some consider my style "unhelpful".
I seem to be getting lower ratings than before, but still at 4 or above (out of 5).
Maybe it's me, maybe it's the crowd I am teaching (who have changed).
I do not know & in a small way I don't really care.
I teach what they need to know.
The way of teaching may not translate well to everybody.
These skills must be there/ must be demonstrated, otherwise it is a no go.
I hope, whether they like me or not, they take away some skills/ knowledge to help them survive.
In their career or for life in general (because the alternative of a law degree is a little expensive!)